Evaluate individual framework controls against organizational documentation with evidence extraction, quality evaluation, severity classification, and actionable remediation recommendations.

From document to output

Specify the control

Provide the control ID (e.g., AC-2, 164.312(a)(1), A.9.4.1)

Provide your document

The policy or procedure document to assess against

Evidence is extracted

Direct quotes are pulled from every relevant section

Quality is evaluated

Evidence is rated: specific procedures > general policy statements

Severity is classified

Gaps rated critical/high/medium/low with remediation timelines

What you get back

Every finding is structured JSON — status, evidence, risk level, and remediation in one package. No interpretation required before acting on it.

Example response
{
  "control_id": "AU-6",
  "control_name": "Audit Record Review, Analysis, and Reporting",
  "status": "partial",
  "severity": "high",
  "confidence": 0.85,
  "gap_description": "Log storage exists but no review schedule, responsible parties, or escalation procedures defined."
}

Two ways to run this skill

Control Assessment SKILL.md

Download the skill file and run it with any LLM that supports structured instructions. Apache 2.0 licensed. No account required.

Five other skills in the platform.

HIPAA Gap Analysis, BAA Review, Framework Mapping, Control Assessment, Compliance Q&A — and Sentinel for continuous monitoring.